SummerPhD ( talk) 03:13, 1 June 2010 (UTC) I am having trouble with repeated assertions that IMDB is not a source, or not reliable as a general statement. Additionally, on a future film, its information must be from the studio (i.e., not independent of the production) or gathered from unknown sources (i.e., not reliable). At the moment, the article has zero independent reliable sources. doncram ( talk) 01:52, 1 June 2010 (UTC) The tag is there because we need substantial coverage in independent reliable sources before any future film is notable, even if it is directed by God with Jesus starring as Himself.
So, surely there must be more coverage that could be added to this article. But, this seems like a big film, based on its having an actor list that is impressive to me-and i don't know many actor names at all. I don't happen to know much about that policy or guideline or practice. But there's a hidden comment next to the "notability" tag in the article, asserting that future films are not notable unless there is substantial coverage about them. I removed the "unsourced" tag and wanted to remove the "notability" tag on the article.
0 kommentar(er)
